DK Board of Trustees To Tell County: 'We're Not GHAAC Members, and GHAAC Does Not Represent DK'
February 9, 2007 -- On
Thursday, Feb. 7, the Driftwood Key Board of Trustees came to a
consensus at a workshop meeting that they will send a letter to Kitsap
County saying that they are not a member of the Greater Hansville Area
Advisory Committee (GHAAC).
Since its inception, the GHAAC
political interest group has listed Driftwood Key as a member, although
no DK board resolution was ever passed to join the group.
Driftwood
Key residents are urged to attend the formal Board meeting next
Thursday (Feb. 14) at 7:00 p.m., at the Driftwood Key Club House to
make their concerns known and to urge the board to consider polling
it's membership on the speed bump issue.
One trustee confirmed that GHAAC's free access to the club's newsletter will be terminated.
For several months, DK has listed Jerry Ulsund in its official communications newsletter, the Keynotes,
as a "committee chair" responsible for the "Advisory Council" which
refers to GHAAC. It gave the appearance that Mr. Ulsund was officially
representing DK at GHAAC functions.
A former board president
warned the trustees last month that the voting scheme laid out by GHAAC
bylaws could have broad implications on issues ranging from county
storm water management resources to the DK Club's future ability to
keep its harbor dredged.
For related stories, see the News Archive page.
DK contact information:
Click here to see beep4bumps warning about GHAAC involvement.
Beep4bumps
has also asked the department to provide records related to the false
25 mph speed limits posted on Hood Canal Drive a few years ago. Some
Kitsap County residents have told beep4bumps that they had
received citations under the false speed limit but were never refunded
for their fines and did not have their driving records cleared of the
charges. Click here for this email to Ms. Collings. Ms Collings, who was sent the request
on December 3, said she passed the request on to Karen Brezler of the
department on the 10th after beep4bumps emailed a follow up request
inquiring about the delay. The follow up letter also inquired about
additional safety issues at the speed bumps. Click here for that email.
'30 to 45 Business Days' for Records Investigation into Phony 25 mph Hood Canal Dr Speed Limit Signs, Sheriff Dept. Says
Beep4bumps Raises Additional Safety Concerns Regarding Bumps to Sheriff's Dept.
December 16, 2007 -- Beep4bumps has asked Kathy
Collings of the department's Detective/Support Services Division, to
provide information regarding patrol hours for November at the speed
bumps and citations written for RCW 46.37.380.
Ms Brezler wrote the morning of Friday, Dec. 14, "We
received your e-mail request regarding false speed signs on December
10, 2007. A proper response to your request may take 30-45 business
days from the date of this letter. Sincerely, Karen M. Brezler, Support
Services Specialist, #1030 Records Unit - Dissemination"
Collings
provided redacted copies of citations written in north Kitsap County in
October and comments on the time spent patrolling the speed bump roads.
Beep4bumps has since asked for November's statistics and when told of
the delay on the other information, has asked in advance for statistics
for January and February.
See the Sheriff Page for more details.
Please
note that if you have information related to the activities of the
Sheriff's Department that would be of benefit to readers, please let us
know at: info@beep4bumps.com.
BEEPNOTE:
Public record requests are on-going and will be frequent as north
Kitsap County taxpayers sort out the problems associated with traffic
issues in their neighborhoods and on their commuter routes, especially
as they relate to false speed limits and installation of speed bumps.
Beep4bumps asks that
any frustration for frequent records and data requests of the various
county departments not be directed at the requesters of this
information, but rather, at those who made these requests necessary,
namely Commissioner Steve Bauer and his Greater Hansville Area Advisory
Council (GHAAC).
(pictured) to weigh in on the group's obligations under state law, namely the state's Open Public Meetings Act and Public Records Act.
Kitsap County Responds to
City of Kirkland Speed Bump Survey; Kitsap Responses Contradict
Cliffside and Hansville Bump Installations
December 16, 2007 -- In
an effort to determine what other Washington state communities are
doing to slow speeders in residential neighborhoods, the City of
Kirkland surveyed other local governments including Kitsap County.
Released October 18, 2007, the Regional Survey of Neighborhood Traffic Control Program Critera,
contains responses from Kitsap County that clearly contradict the speed
devices installed on Hood Canal Drive and Twin Spits Road.
The
survey asks respondents: "What support rate do you require for the
installation of traffic calming devices such as traffic circles and
speed humps?"
Kitsap County's
response: "70%." But when asked, "How do you define the area of
households who get to vote?" Kitsap County responded, "People who live
on the street or have to drive on that street to get home."
The
vast majority of users of Hood Canal Drive and Twin Spits Road were
never surveyed at all. The Road Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC) claims that written petitions signed by those residents now
living on the bumps were submitted to the county. However, despite
repeated requests, no such petitions have been made available to the
public.
Surveys may be moot, however, since the county says such roads aren't even eligible for such devices.
The
survey asks if respondants have "minimum/maximum traffic volume and/or
street classification requirements." Kitsap County's answer: "200
-3,000 vpd. Must be in a 25-mph zone with the street classified as
residential. Calming devices are discouraged on collector roads."
Regarding
rule exceptions, the survey asks, "If a 'warrant' were not met for a
traffic-calming device, under what conditions, if any, would you
allow/recommend the device be installed anyway? Stronger support than
your minimum required?" Kitsap County had no response, but then when
asked if money came from a non-city [governmental] funding source?
Kitsap County responded, "Yes, but the device still requires a 70%
support rate."
Click here to read the full City of Kirkland survey report.
Beeping Mad?
Help Us Publicize Beep4Bumps!
November 14, 2007 -- If
you want to reclaim the public roads you drive home on, consider this
your web site! Help spread the word. We have a few lawn signs (show
above) that were generously donated to the cause. If you live on a
high-visibility road, email us at , info@beep4bumps.com and we'll do our best to set you up with a sign. If we run out, we'll keep you on our sign list.
BEEPNOTE: Three
of our signs have been stolen. If you have information about who the
culprits might be -- photos, videotape, license numbers, please let us
know. Free speech needs to be protected. Thanks!
Founding Member of Roads Committee Warned Group that Bumps Would 'Pit Neighbor Against Neighbor'
November 23, 2007 -- Neal
Kellner, who founded the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC), says he
warned its members last spring against pushing through a speed bump
plan.
He said that County Commissioner Steve Bauer led
discussions on how to eliminate opposing views from taking over at the
May public meeting at which the committee made its recommendation to
the county to install the bumps. Bauer has ignored all emails and
phone calls from authors of this website.
Kellner says his
prediction that the bumps would meet with negative reaction has turned
out to be an understatement and he added that bumps threaten to damage
"our newly formed government structure," referring to the Greater
Hansville Area Advisory Council (GHAAC).
RSAC Member Urges Your Participation at Dec. 4 Committee Meeting at DWK Clubhouse
Requests Records of GHAAC and Commissioner Bauer
November 23, 2007 -- RSAC
Committee Member John Wiegenstein, of Heller Wiegenstein PLLC Law
Offices, is urging Kitsap County residents to attend the Road Safety
Advisory Committee (RSAC) Dec. 4 at 7:00 p.m. at the Driftwood Key
Clubhouse to voice your concerns with the speed bumps.
"We need real, unfiltered public input," he said.
He
has asked Judith Foritano, chair of the Greater Hansville Area Advisory
Council (GHAAC), for all documents relating to the formation, operation
and function of the Road Safety Advisory Committee and it's
relationship to the GHAAC. See his letter here.
He
also requested that Commissioner Steve Bauer provide information in an
effort to help area residents better understand how the county's
decision was made on this issue. See his letter here.
Bauer provided an incomplete response to which Wiegenstein requested further information. See email string here.
Beep4bumps has also asked the department to provide records related to the false 25 mph speed limits posted on Hood Canal Drive a few years ago. Some Kitsap County residents have told beep4bumps that they had received citations under the false speed limit but were never refunded for their fines and did not have their driving records cleared of the charges. Click here for this email to Ms. Collings.
Collings provided redacted copies of citations written in north Kitsap County in October and comments on the time spent patrolling the speed bump roads.
See the Sheriff Page for more details.
Please note that if you have information related to the activities of the Sheriff's Department that would be of benefit to readers, please let us know at: info@beep4bumps.com.
Commissioner Bauer's Comments to Wiegenstein Read Aloud at Committee Meeting
December 9, 2007 -- John Wiegenstein, member of the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC), told audience members at the committee's Dec. 4 meeting that he received an email from former committee member and now Kitsap County Commissioner, Steve Bauer.
Wiegenstein told the committee and its audience that Commissioner Bauer will only discuss the speed bump issue under Bauer's specific conditions.
Beep4bumps author, John Hostvedt, had a copy of the letter and read Bauer's comments aloud. Bauer, in his letter to Wiegenstein, writes: "I am happy to work with any of my neighbors and constituents. However, on this topic [speed tables], I will confine myself to working with folks who: 1.) Acknowledge that speeding is a problem, 2.) are committed to seeking cost effective solutions to the problem (even if they are different than the speed tables), and 3) are willing to work through the Traffic Safety Committee and GHAAC."
Click here to read the actual email exchange.
Steve Bauer continues to ignore all email and voice mail messages left for him by authors of this website. Bauer's email address is SBauer@co.kitsap.wa.us.
New 'Beeps' Page Dedicated to Open, Responsive, and Accountable Government
December 11, 2007 -- There are several measures we can use to determine if our government is open, honest, and responsive.
Does it comply with laws that require open meetings and open records? Does it operate in transparent ways and make decisions with full disclosure? Does it make an extra effort to be sure that special interests aren't overshadowing the public interest?
Beep4bumps is pleased to introduce a new page called "Hello Commissioners!" On it, we've published letters that you've send to the Kitsap County Commission. We pose the simple question, have you gotten a response? Hello Commissioners? Knock, knock, anyone home?
Frankly, we at beep4bumps, are tired of telling you that we are being ignored by the commissioners and our local committees, GHAAC, RSAC, etc., when we ask them to answer simple questions about the speed bumps. But sadly, we're finding out more and more that we're not alone.
Bottom line: We're frustrated when we get ignored but nothing makes us more angry than when YOU get ignored.
Please visit the Hello Commissioners! to see what your neighbors are asking of YOUR commission. And please also visit the Washington State Attorney General's page on Open Government.
-- Committee members circulated a petition to only the residents living at the location of the speed bumps. This runs contrary to county policy, where support for the bumps must reach 70 percent among both those at the bumps and those that will have to travel the bumps. Users of the roads, comprising over 1,100 households in the 98340 zip code, were not included in the petition drive. For the petitions, click here. -- Kitsap County recommended that those using the roads be surveyed about the speed bumps, but meeting minutes show that committee members said it would hurt their chances for getting the bumps installed. See "old business" section of the minutes of March 6, 2007. The minutes state: "The county has suggested sending out survey fliers as our project deviates from the county standards. Patricia [Pinkham, committee co-chair] explained that these will not be surveys, but non-detailed informational fliers."
Newly Released Records Show Road Committee Declined County's Directive to Survey All Area Residents About Speed Bumps
Committee Opted for 'Non-Detailed' Informational Flier to Introduce May Speed Bump Meeting; Fliers Mailed 'Week of May 7th' for May 15th Session, Yet Meeting Date Was Established Two Months Prior
December 30, 2007 -- In records just released more than two months after beep4bumps.com's initial October request, the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) rejected a county recommendation that they survey all north Kitsap County residents.
Kitsap County Commissioner Steve Bauer and local traffic committee members continue to maintain that the process that brought about speed bumps on Hood Canal Dr, Twin Spits Road, and Bridgeview Dr. was widely publicized, inclusive, and had broad community support.
Committee meeting minutes paint a different picture, however.
Records show that the overwhelming majority of road committee members were residents living at the locations where speed bumps were being demanded, not membership from a cross section of Hansville residents who actually use the roads every day.
Further, records show that:
-- The cost estimate for the speed bumps was $40,000 and committee members knew that in March 2007, but presentation materials later used to sell the bumps at a community meeting said $30,000. Actual costs have exceed $48,000. See meeting minutes from March 6, 2007. -- Meeting minutes of August 29, 2006 detail how then committee chair Neal Kellner "...suggested that over 50% of the commuters will not want any speed reduction devices and suggested taking the information only to heavily impacted areas. He suggested taking petitions to local organization, [sic] the Community Center, Cliffside, Hansville for greater impact." -- Chris Endresen wrote to the committee, as indicated in the June 27, 2006 minutes, saying that if Twin Spits gets speed bumps, then Hood Canal Drive should get speed bumps to discourage those avoiding them on Twin Spits Road. Other records, however, show that residents on Hood Canal Dr. had already been agitating for speed bumps in 2005. Click here for a report from the county on Hood Canal Dr.
To review traffic safety minutes from June 6, 2006 to Nov. 6, 2007, visit our Public Records page. The county did not respond to inquiries by beep4bumps.com regarding why these minutes were unavailable in October, November, and most of December.
DK Board of Trustees to Discuss 'Official' Membership in Group That Gave Us the Bumps; GHAAC
Beeps Site Says, "No Way!"
January 9, 2008 -- Thursday, Jan. 10 at 7:00 p.m., the Driftwood Key Home Owner's Association Board of Trustees will discuss whether to join the Greater Hansville Area Advisory Council (GHAAC).
GHAAC, the group that got Kitsap County to install the speed bumps on Hansville arterial roads against the county's own policy, already considers DK a member and claims DK resident Jerry Ulsund as DK's representative. One board member noted that Mr. Ulsund has not attended board meetings.
At a board workshop last week, however, board members said that no such membership was ever acknowledged by the board, no such resolution was ever passed.
On the same June, 2007, day that the Kitsap County Commissioners voted to install the bumps, they also gave GHAAC official recognition as the voice of Hansville to county government.
Thursday's meeting at the DK clubhouse is open to the public and public comment regarding GHAAC membership.
Beep4bumps.com has recommended that DK not join based on GHAAC's failure to accurately represent the residents of north Kitsap County. However, if such membership is contemplated, the DK Board must insist that specific conditions be met. Among them:
Beep4bumps authors contend that the Hansville area does not need a "shadow" government of unelected people with special, sometimes selfish, interests.
If Hansville actually wants a government, there are incorporation processes that can facilitate that. Incorporation is not being recommended, but neither is an unnecessary "fake" government that has vividly demonstrated that it cannot be trusted.
Beeps4bumps would be happy to give the GHAAC point of view in this forum, but they've not responded to any email inquiries for records or information.
Note: If you're able to attend the meeting, please feel free to share your thoughts on the session at beep4bumps.com.
--NEW--
DK Board of Trustees Hears Warning About GHAAC "Shadow Government"; Delays Action Until Membership Weighs In
January 13, 2007 -- On Thursday, Jan. 10 at 7:00 p.m., the Driftwood Key (DK) Home Owner's Association Board of Trustees heard from a handful of DK members who warned that endorsing membership in the Greater Hansville Area Advisory Council would be tantamount to endorsing a "shadow government" that no one in Kitsap county elected.
For months, DK has listed Jerry Ulsund in its official communications newsletter, the Keynotes, as a "committee chair" responsible for the "Advisory Council" which refers to GHAAC.
Yet board members note that no such resolution was ever passed by the DK board to join GHAAC and Ulsund has not attended board meetings.
A former board president warned the gathering that the voting scheme layed out by GHAAC bylaws could have broad implications on issues ranging from county storm water management resources to the DK Club's future ability to keep it's harbor dredged.
In addition, the Driftwood Key area referred to in GHAAC's bylaws is a "geographic area" that includes homes outside of the homeowner's association. It's conceivable, one board member said, that we could have someone not living DK representing DK to the GHAAC.
The DK Board and Jerry Ulsund have been hearing from you on this issue. The board, however, needs much more input before taking action on GHAAC-related issues, including the speed bumps. You can write to them with your concerns or questions.
DK contact information:
Click here to see beep4bumps warning about GHAAC involvement.
Bumps Patrolled 1.3% in October
One Ticket Written for Obscure RCW 46.37.380
November 23, 2007 -- Sheriff's deputes sat for a total of approximately 10.5 hours on traffic control in the area of the speed tables in October, the sheriff's department reports. That's about 1.3 percent of all the hours possible in a month.
Kathy Collings of the department's Detective/Support Services Division provided that figure in an email to John Hostvedt of beep4bumps.com.
"Those working traffic noted that they gave six or so verbal warnings for honking," she said in her email.
Collings provided redacted copies of citations written in north Kitsap County in October.
Beep4bumps.com Window Clings Now Available; Spread the Word
--Commentary--
By John Hostvedt & Therese Reilly
January 13, 2007 -- BEEPNOTE: Just a few months ago, we at Beep4bumps.com had no idea how many people shared our view that the installation of the speed bumps was the wrong thing to do on our only two roads in and out of the area.
So we started this site at our own personal expense to test the waters. The response has far exceeded our expectations. Over 3,000 unique visitors!
We've received hundreds of e-mails in support of the site and the mailing list grows by the day. You are speaking loudly and clearly. You want to return our roads to the smooth safe roads we had before GHAAC changed all that.
We make no apologies for the fact that this is a site with a point of view -- that the bumps must go! At the same time, we've really tried to encourage readers of this site to do their own homework and think for themselves.
We haven't told you to beep but we can't blame you if you do.
It's personal. We beep at the bumps because it's the only way we can ensure the highest level of safety for ourselves as motorists and others in a less-than-safe and bumpy environment.
We rarely see pedestrians anywhere near the bumps, but we beep when I do see them -- beep beep. We wave, too. If there's a more courteous way to demonstrate our concern for safety, someone will have to let us know. One thing we do know, complete silence on these bumps is very, very dangerous.
We've been attacked personally, we've been threatened, and we've even been called names in meetings by a couple of folks.
We've even gotten this mean-spirited venom from people as old as my 80-something mother. She'd wash out a few mouths with soap if she were in Hansville listening to this hate talk!
But it just tells us a little about who wants these bumps to stay.
They're saying we're stirring up dissension in the community but that really has us puzzled. We didn't install the bumps! Before the bumps arrived, things seemed pretty peaceful to us! And frankly we're hard pressed to think of many things more disruptive to a community than a bunch of selfish homeowners installing punishing bumps on our access roads. Honestly, who is causing dissent?
Advocates of these speed bumps have had every opportunity to provide you with any amount of information to assert their position but instead they've chosen to engage in personal attacks. They also put out scant, unsubstantiated info on their Hansville website and they do so anonymously. I'm not fooled and I don't think you are either.
Among the courageous beep4bumps supporters, we've had volunteers pay for and post lawn signs that have been stolen. So our opponents are none too comfortable with the facts and opinions we've been able to present to you on this website. And it should be noted, they've made no attempt to refute these facts, either.
But the out pouring of support has been worth enduring all the hurtful chatter from the pro-bump camp.
We won't be turned around by the folks in this community that would try to impede your right to know. So, while they keep stealing our lawn signs, we offer you window clings to sport proudly in your car windows or home windows.
We've made a limited supply and we'll be happy to send you some if you request them at info@beep4bumps.com.
Unlike bumper stickers, window clings can be easily peeled off a window and discarded when its message is no longer needed. And it's our wish that very soon there won't be any bumps to beep for at all!
Again, thanks for your kind words and support. As always, I invite you to write your opinions for the site but more than that, I strongly urge you to write to your local, county, state, and federal officials and home owner associations to demand that these bumps be removed.
-- Committee members circulated a petition to only the residents living at the location of the speed bumps. This runs contrary to county policy, where support for the bumps must reach 70 percent among both those at the bumps and those that will have to travel the bumps. Users of the roads, comprising over 1,100 households in the 98340 zip code, were not included in the petition drive. For the petitions, click here. -- Kitsap County recommended that those using the roads be surveyed about the speed bumps, but meeting minutes show that committee members said it would hurt their chances for getting the bumps installed. See "old business" section of the minutes of March 6, 2007. The minutes state: "The county has suggested sending out survey fliers as our project deviates from the county standards. Patricia [Pinkham, committee co-chair] explained that these will not be surveys, but non-detailed informational fliers."
Newly Released Records Show Road Committee Declined County's Directive to Survey All Area Residents About Speed Bumps
Committee Opted for 'Non-Detailed' Informational Flier to Introduce May Speed Bump Meeting; Fliers Mailed 'Week of May 7th' for May 15th Session, Yet Meeting Date Was Established Two Months Prior
December 30, 2007 -- In records just released more than two months after beep4bumps.com's initial October request, the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) rejected a county recommendation that they survey all north Kitsap County residents.
Kitsap County Commissioner Steve Bauer and local traffic committee members continue to maintain that the process that brought about speed bumps on Hood Canal Dr, Twin Spits Road, and Bridgeview Dr. was widely publicized, inclusive, and had broad community support.
Committee meeting minutes paint a different picture, however.
Records show that the overwhelming majority of road committee members were residents living at the locations where speed bumps were being demanded, not membership from a cross section of Hansville residents who actually use the roads every day.
Further, records show that:
-- The cost estimate for the speed bumps was $40,000 and committee members knew that in March 2007, but presentation materials later used to sell the bumps at a community meeting said $30,000. Actual costs have exceed $48,000. See meeting minutes from March 6, 2007. -- Meeting minutes of August 29, 2006 detail how then committee chair Neal Kellner "...suggested that over 50% of the commuters will not want any speed reduction devices and suggested taking the information only to heavily impacted areas. He suggested taking petitions to local organization, [sic] the Community Center, Cliffside, Hansville for greater impact." -- Chris Endresen wrote to the committee, as indicated in the June 27, 2006 minutes, saying that if Twin Spits gets speed bumps, then Hood Canal Drive should get speed bumps to discourage those avoiding them on Twin Spits Road. Other records, however, show that residents on Hood Canal Dr. had already been agitating for speed bumps in 2005. Click here for a report from the county on Hood Canal Dr.
To review traffic safety minutes from June 6, 2006 to Nov. 6, 2007, visit our Public Records page. The county did not respond to inquiries by beep4bumps.com regarding why these minutes were unavailable in October, November, and most of December.
C/O Heller Wiegenstein PLLC
Law Offices
144 Railroad Avenue, Suite 210
Driftwood Key Residents Write to County; Commissioner Jan Angel Responds
Tom and Maryln Nelson, in a letter to the Kitsap County Commission, said former Commissioner Chris Endresen and her replacement Steve Bauer have done a great
disservice to the north end of Kitsap County.
Commissioner Jan Angel (pictured) responded: "Commissioner Endresen insured us, there had been community meetings and this is what folks wanted, even if it appeared to be outside the policy of the public works department. Now it is done - - - and folks do not appear to want or need them."
Click here to see the Nelson's letter and Angel's response.
Regarding Speed Bumps Commissioner Bauer Tells Committee Member He Will 'Confine Himself' to Work Only With Constituents Who Meet His Conditions
John Wiegenstein, a member of the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC), received a response from Commissioner Steve Bauer that Wiegenstein said amazed him. Click here for Bauer's response to Wiegenstein.
Bauer told Wiegenstein in the email, "I am happy to work with any of my neighbors and constituents. However, on this topic [speed tables], I will confine myself to working with folks who: 1.) Acknowledge that speeding is a problem, 2.) are committed to seeking cost effective solutions to the problem (even if they are different than the speed tables), and 3) are willing to work through the Traffic Safety Committee and GHAAC."
Wiegenstein said he found Bauer's comments amazing. "Also," Wiegenstein continued, "he seems to think that it is my obligation to address his concerns, not the other way around, which seems to me to be a complete reversal of roles in the process. Bizarre."
"The more I read his email the more it simply looks like 'if you don't agree with me, and if you don't channel yourself through the RSAC and GHAAC, then you can just shut up.' I can't believe it." Wiegenstein said.
Weigenstein urged North Kitsap County residents to attend the Dec. 4 RSAC meeting at 7 p.m. at the Driftwood Key Clubhouse.
Steve Bauer continues to ignore all email and voice mail messages left for him by authors of this website. Bauer's email address is SBauer@co.kitsap.wa.us.
appeasing speed bump advocates on Twin Spits Road in October of 2006.
The "Facts" from GHAAC?
You Decide
Beep4bumps.com visited www.hansville.org, the website apparently run by the Greater Hansville Area Advisory Council (GHAAC). On it they posted a letter written by the advisory group but it contains no names so we don't actually know which individuals it represents or where they live.
Despite an email link in the letter saying you can write to them to get more information, we've received nothing from them after requesting information at that email address. If you get a response from them, let us know at info@beep4bumps.com
The GHAAC claims to have the 'facts" about the process that brought us all these bumps. We read the letter very carefully and didn't see much in the way of facts, but plenty of preaching. And we think greater Hansville residents deserve more.
Click here to see a copy of their letter with our questions and comments added in red. North Kitsap County would like answers from this anonymous group of non-elected, self-appointed road engineers who seem to know what's best for all of us.
County Records Show Bumps Inappropriate for Hood Canal Drive and Twin Spits Road
Kitsap County Public Records, obtained by the creators of Beep4Bumps, show that these speed bumps were "speedily" shoved through the County Commission in June just before former County Commissioner Chris Endresen left her commission post to become State Director for US Sen. Maria Cantwell.
Records also show that the county's public works department recommended against them, saying, "Traffic calming measures are most effectively employed on local access roads, not roads that are expected to move higher volumes of traffic from residential areas to the arterial network." Visit our new Public Records Page.
Beep4Bumps asked Endresen's replacement, Kitsap County Commissioner Steve Bauer, for all county records pertaining to the speed bumps on thoroughfares in North Kitsap County. He has ignored our requests. And continues to ignore emails and phone calls.
However, after filing a public records request with the county, we received a nearly four inch thick stack of documents that show:
Poulsbo resident Endresen was in frequent e-mail contact with residents along Hood Canal Drive discussing the how to get the speed bumps pushed through while ignoring the advise of professionals that warned against the "speed calming" devices.
Beep4Bumps is not interested in having you take our word for it. We will strive to provide as many public records as we can and make them available here for your convenience. Be patient as it may take some time go get them scanned and organized. It's a very time consuming process.
Kitsap Resident Suggests Speaking Out at Dec. 11th GHAAC Meeting
Hansville Log Newsletter Reports "No Comments" on Speed Bumps from Nov. 13 Meeting; Minutes Ignore Comments from Nov. 6 RSAC Meeting
Poulsbo Public Works Said 'No' to Speed Bumps for Their City in July, Hansville Resident Tells RSAC
"Speeding is an enforcement problem, not an engineering problem."
-- Andrzej Kasiniak, City of Poulsbo Public Works Engineer
December 9, 2007 -- Therese Reilly, resident of Driftwood Key, told the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) at its Dec. 4 meeting that the City of Poulsbo rejected a move for speed bumps.
Citing official Poulsbo documents, Reilly said, "These are the minutes of a meeting that are not from the other side of the country or even, for that matter, the other side of the state. These are meeting minutes from the City of Poulsbo from our own county."
Reilly explained that in a discussion on city policy, Jeff Bauman, of Poulsbo's public works department, is on record in the July 25, 2007 public works committee minutes as opposing speed bumps.
The document attributes Bauman as stating: "Speed bumps don't work and speed reader boards work well."
Contrary to what occured in Hansville, Poulsbo's Bauman proposes that that the public works professionals review road criteria eligiblity before any committee or council can initiate a request for the installation of traffic calming devices such as speed bumps, Reilly said.
Poulsbo records show that Chris Morrison, of the Poulsbo Fire Department, told city officials that the long-term maintenance of fire and water trucks would be impacted by speed humps.
Further, Morrison said, speed humps will interrupt care to patients in EMT vehicles and that such vehicles should move as quickly as possible through city streets.
For a complete copy of the July 25 meeting minutes, click here.
--NEW--
Wiegenstein Reaches Out to Commissioners Brown and Angel: Give Careful Consideration to Communications from Hansville Citizens Aggrieved by 'What Was Done and How it Was Done' Going into 2008
December 27, 2007 -- John Wiegenstein (pictured), an outspoken opponent of the
speed bumps, wrote to the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners -- directing his comments primarily at Commissioners Jan Angel and Josh Brown. He stressed that despite what their fellow Commissioner Steve Bauer (former member of the citizen's committee that urged the speed bumps and now chairman of the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners) might be suggesting, opposition to the speed bumps is not comprised of "one or two unhappy cranks who probably find fault with anything the county does."
Said Wiegenstein, "You may have concluded that such persons and views are isolated and not representative of more widely held public opinion. I have no doubt that this is Mr. Bauer’s view, and I would guess that he has encouraged Ms. Angel and Mr. Brown to see this the same way.
"I respectfully suggest that Mr. Bauer is quite wrong in that assessment, if that is indeed his assessment, and I respectfully encourage all of you to give your careful consideration to the ongoing communications which will be directed to you as we move into 2008, and to the concerns of the numerous Hansville area citizens who are aggrieved by what was done, and how it was done."
Bauer was appointed to fill the unfinished term of former commissioner Chris Endresen when Endresen left to take a job with US Sen. Maria Cantwell's office. Before being appointed, he and Endresen advocated for the speed bumps and other "traffic calming" measures in sharp contrast to County Public Works policies that prohibit these devices on county collector and arterial roads.
Wiegenstein goes on to inform the commissioners of the lack of records responses from the Greater Hansville Area Advisory Council (GHAAC). He encloses records request letters, dated Nov. 17, 2007 and Dec. 3, 2007, addressed to the soon-to-be GHAAC Chair Judith Foritano. Wiegenstein tells commissioners that the requests have not been granted by Foritano or the GHAAC.
"If these aspects of community advisory councils generally, and the GHAAC in particular, are to be given detailed scrutiny in both the political and/or judicial forum, it seems to me that the Board of Commissioners would prefer that to happen in a setting where the community council in question has truly put its best foot forward, by demonstrating the existence of a truly inclusive, well publicized, democratic process in which the bedrock concept of “one person, one vote” has actually been observed and maintained." Wiegenstein writes, "Although investigation and analysis are, of course, ongoing, I expect that the GHAAC and its Hansville speed bump project will prove to be poor candidates for such a showing."
For the complete text of Wiegenstein's letter and attachments, click here.
-- Committee members circulated a petition to only the residents living at the location of the speed bumps. This runs contrary to county policy, where support for the bumps must reach 70 percent among both those at the bumps and those that will have to travel the bumps. Users of the roads, comprising over 1,100 households in the 98340 zip code, were not included in the petition drive. For the petitions, click here. -- Kitsap County recommended that those using the roads be surveyed about the speed bumps, but meeting minutes show that committee members said it would hurt their chances for getting the bumps installed. See "old business" section of the minutes of March 6, 2007. The minutes state: "The county has suggested sending out survey fliers as our project deviates from the county standards. Patricia [Pinkham, committee co-chair] explained that these will not be surveys, but non-detailed informational fliers."
Newly Released Records Show Road Committee Declined County's Directive to Survey All Area Residents About Speed Bumps
Committee Opted for 'Non-Detailed' Informational Flier to Introduce May Speed Bump Meeting; Fliers Mailed 'Week of May 7th' for May 15th Session, Yet Meeting Date Was Established Two Months Prior
December 30, 2007 -- In records just released more than two months after beep4bumps.com's initial October request, the Road Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) rejected a county recommendation that they survey all north Kitsap County residents.
Kitsap County Commissioner Steve Bauer and local traffic committee members continue to maintain that the process that brought about speed bumps on Hood Canal Dr, Twin Spits Road, and Bridgeview Dr. was widely publicized, inclusive, and had broad community support.
Committee meeting minutes paint a different picture, however.
Records show that the overwhelming majority of road committee members were residents living at the locations where speed bumps were being demanded, not membership from a cross section of Hansville residents who actually use the roads every day.
Further, records show that:
-- The cost estimate for the speed bumps was $40,000 and committee members knew that in March 2007, but presentation materials later used to sell the bumps at a community meeting said $30,000. Actual costs have exceed $48,000. See meeting minutes from March 6, 2007. -- Meeting minutes of August 29, 2006 detail how then committee chair Neal Kellner "...suggested that over 50% of the commuters will not want any speed reduction devices and suggested taking the information only to heavily impacted areas. He suggested taking petitions to local organization, [sic] the Community Center, Cliffside, Hansville for greater impact." -- Chris Endresen wrote to the committee, as indicated in the June 27, 2006 minutes, saying that if Twin Spits gets speed bumps, then Hood Canal Drive should get speed bumps to discourage those avoiding them on Twin Spits Road. Other records, however, show that residents on Hood Canal Dr. had already been agitating for speed bumps in 2005. Click here for a report from the county on Hood Canal Dr.
To review traffic safety minutes from June 6, 2006 to Nov. 6, 2007, visit our Public Records page. The county did not respond to inquiries by beep4bumps.com regarding why these minutes were unavailable in October, November, and most of December.