Jessica K. said: April 22, 2008 3:59 pm PST
What makes me 'beeping' bloody mad, and has for a very long time now is the simple fact of the GHAAC 's apparent 'democratic' approval of the bumps, let alone their very existance and access to make 'public policy'. The first thing I tried to learn about the speed tables, was whether this was an actual vote involving the GHA, thus giving it some actual standing politically. More than shocked, I was greatly insulted as a member of the community and registered voter, that I nor my family and neighbors recieved any notification of the tables let alone a community vote! Personally, I see this in the highest sense a disregard for the democratic process that is due for ALL levels of government.
Another thing that worried me was for the welfare of my older neighbors and grandparents. The 'offical' claim is that this will not cut down ambulence response time, though as Ms. Melody Butler has stated, ambulences just like other automobiles (if they value their suspension system...) have to decrease their speed for the tables anyways. As for studies on the actual effectiveness of the speed tables, as any researcher or even grade school child can tell you, claiming results from someone and somewhere else is one thing, to prove its truthful claim you will have to study the process YOURSELF.
Until such a study is personally conducted by our county government AND posted/make available for its community residents, I cannot find reasonable proof for the use of speed tables.
John, good sir, I do hope you show our county government and this so called 'representative council' GHAAC, what their community really wants on their roads and in their government. Best of wishes and luck at the meeting!